About the Journal
Instead of waiting a year or more for peer review, articles are
published first and then open reviewed post-publication
by members. All reviews, responses, and revisions are published along
with the article.
Open access means no paywalls to read articles. No
barrier to contributing to your field and getting cited.
Instead of a typical Article Processing Charge (APC) of $1,500-6,000+ to
publish each article, members usually pay modest annual dues of $100 to
publish unlimited articles.
Our Publishing Model
Frequently Asked Questions
About the Journal
What are the Journal's aim and scope?
The aim of the Journal is to advance science by making research
easier to access and publish and by avoiding institutional bias or
politics.
The Journal includes all scientific fields, including natural
sciences, formal sciences, social sciences, and applied sciences like
engineering and medicine. It does not include the humanities.
What is the Journal’s target readership?
The Journal is primarily for scientific researchers and
practitioners, but it includes some features to make it more
accessible to laypeople.
What kinds of articles does the Journal publish?
The Journal publishes original research (research articles,
brief reports, registered reports, monographs, theses, and
dissertations), reviews (including systematic reviews and
meta-analyses), cases (case reports, case series, case studies),
methods (method articles, software tool articles, study protocols),
and data notes (including genome notes). To counter publication bias,
we welcome replications and null findings.
What is the Journal’s publication schedule?
Articles are published on a continuous basis.
Who is on the Journal’s editorial board?
Because articles are published first and then peer reviewed, the Journal does not have a traditional editorial board that decides
which articles to publish.
Publishing Model
What’s the difference between the Journal and a preprint
server?
A preprint server archives articles before they are published and does
not include a review process. The Journal’s articles are
published first and then reviewed.
Why are articles published before being peer reviewed?
To make research immediately available, articles are published first,
with post-publication peer review. Review is a transparent process,
with all reviews and responses publicly visible. This gives reviewers
credit for their work and discourages misbehavior such as personal
attacks or coercive citation.
Metrics
What is the Journal’s Impact Factor?
Because the Journal does not have a traditional editorial board
that decides which articles to publish, it is not indexed in Web of
Science, which Clarivate uses to calculate Journal Impact Factor.
Among other problems, Journal Impact Factor reflects the mean of
citations of all a journal’s articles and can be skewed by a few
highly cited articles. It is therefore not an accurate measure of the
impact of a journal’s typical article. For this and other reasons,
DORA recommends that
-
Journal-based metrics should not be used to measure an individual
article’s quality or an individual scientist’s contributions and...
- Journals stop promoting Journal Impact Factor.
What article-level metrics does the Journal provide?
Each article shows views, downloads, saves, and shares.
Business Model
What fees does the Journal charge?
The Journal does not charge article processing charges (APCs)
to publish. Dues-paying members of the Academy who are of an
appropriate tier may publish unlimited articles with no additional
fees. For more information on membership, please see the
membership tier comparison.
How does the Journal make money without APCs?
International Academy of Science (IAS), the publisher of the Journal, is a nonprofit organization, so the Journal is not
driven by profit. IAS is supported by membership dues and donations.
For more about IAS, visit
www.science.edu/ias.
For Authors
Who can publish articles in the Journal?
All members besides affiliates may publish articles. Members without
advanced degrees may publish articles, but their articles will be held
to the same standard of peer review for the scientific community.
How are articles and reviews licensed?
Articles and reviews are copyrighted by their authors and licensed
under the
Creative Commons Attribution
(CC-BY) license, which allows readers to read, download, and reuse
articles and reviews as long as they give appropriate credit.
Review Process
What kind of peer review does the Journal use?
Using ANSI/NISO
Standard Terminology for Peer Review, the Journal’s peer review is
- Identity transparency: all identities visible
- Reviewer interacts with: authors
-
Review information published: review reports, submitted manuscript,
reviewer identities
-
Post publication commenting: open to members who have securely
signed in
Who can write a review?
All members may write reviews, but we ask reviewers to disclose
relevant expertise and competing interests. A student or early-career
researcher could have enough familiarity with the literature and field
to write a peer review. For articles involving statistics, an expert
statistician could write a statistical review, while a subject matter
expert’s review could exclude statistics.
Why are reviews and reviewers' identities published?
As part of a review, articles receive a star rating, which would
invite abuse if a biased reviewer could anonymously leave 1-star or
5-star reviews that could not be viewed.
Reviewers should both stand behind their reviews and receive proper
credit for their work.
Whom does a reviewer communicate with during the review process?
If necessary to write the review, a reviewer may seek clarification
from the article’s corresponding author in the comments section. For
transparency, public comments are preferred over private messages and
emails.
What’s the difference between a review and a comment?
A review is a formal evaluation of an article’s rigor, writing, and
contribution. It contributes to an article’s star rating. Authors
often revise an article based on feedback from reviews.
A comment is informal and does not need to address all parts of the
article. Comments can receive up or down votes based on their
contribution to the scientific discussion.
While debate is welcome, all members are expected to follow the
Code of Ethics.